« February 2008 | Main

March 18, 2008

Crush Your Enemy Totally (Except When You Shouldn't)

In 1948, Bumpy Johnson was the Godfather of Harlem. As a favor, he took a boy under his wing named Flash. He let him live in his house, had him running errands, let him tag along when he picked up protection money - all the stuff that Frank Lucas claimed do to for Bumpy in American Gangster.

Flash got ahead of himself and started running bad checks through Bumpy's clean bank accounts and allegedly hit on his daughters. He got caught up and over his head and made a succession of unforgivable mistakes. The hammer fell quickly. He beat Flash within an inch of his life on a public street corner. He never even raised his hands to resist. And after a final kick to the head, Bumpy never looked at him again.

Bumpy's crew pleaded that he kill him. With an ass-kicking like that, they said, he'd made himself an enemy for life. He had. Within just a few weeks, Bumpy caught a young woman sent to plant heroin in his house. Later, Flash flipped to the police and snitched on crimes that he'd never even committed. Bumpy did ten years in Alcatraz.

I don't think the lesson is that he should have killed him, although Robert Greene is often right. Maybe he shouldn't have beaten him in the first place. Responding emotionally, as I'm quickly learning, is rarely a good idea. Are the consequences of publicly humiliating someone really worth that soothing rush of adrenaline? It probably says more about you than it does about them. That whole, "I've got to assert my dominance or I won't feel good about myself," is as much weakness as it is anything else. A lot is said about ruthlessness and power, but maybe not enough about restraint.

March 15, 2008

Always Say Less Than Necessary (Except When You Shouldn't)

"A young guy asked, "When you were my age, what did you to elevate yourself among all of your other associates? How did you stand our from the crowd of other, young, ambitious and driven colleagues of your day?" Jack responded "Great question, young man. And this is an important point for every person to hear. The first thing you must understand is the importance of getting out of 'the pile.' The only way you're going to stand out to your boss is to understand this simple principle: When your boss asks you a question, assigns a basic project or sends you out to gather some data, you must understand that your boss already knows the answer he is looking for. As a matter of fact, in most cases, he simply wants you to go out and confirm what he already believes is true in his gut.

Most people simply go out and do just that," Jack continued, "confirm what their boss believed to be true. But here is the difference maker. You must understand that the question is only the beginning. When your boss asks you a question, that question should become the jumping off point for several more ideas and thoughts. If you want to elevate yourself, you must sink your thoughts and time into not only answering the question but going above and beyond it to add value to the train of thought your boss was on.

Practically speaking, that means coming back to the table and presenting to your boss not only an answer, but three or more other ideas, options, and perspectives that were probably not considered by your boss. The goal is to add value to the idea and the thought by exceeding expectation when the question is given to you. This is true not only with questions but assignments, initiatives and everything else ever given to your to run with by upper management.

So if you understand that the question is only the beginning, you will get out of the pile fast, because 99.9 percent of all the employees are in the pile because they don't think.

Thinking for a Change, John C. Maxwell (stolen from Tucker)

March 13, 2008

Stuff You Might Like

Theory of War, Joan Brady
This book is insane. It's the story of a white boy sold into slavery after the Civil War and uses von Clausewitz to follow his lifelong vendetta against his captors - sort of a reverse Gladiator plot. And then we see emotional wreckage with four of his seven children ending their own lives in suicide. All credit goes to TheExecutive here because this book is fucking amazing.

The Correspondence Of Marcus Cornelius Fronto to Marcus Aurelius (free) Marcus Aurelius
I am so disappointed in myself for not finding this earlier. This is a collection of letters between Marcus Aurelius and Fronto, his mentor and friend. Fronto is the person who introduced Marcus to Epictetus - in fact, it's widely believed that Fronto actually attended Epictetus' lectures and gave Marcus his personal class notes. If you liked Meditations, you will shit yourself reading these. He pesters him to make sure he has been writing his daily maxims (the Meditations), chastises him for being lazy and they joke about interesting new words they've found. If you have a mentor, this book will make so much sense to you. I am fairly certain this is the only other thing Marcus Aurelius has ever written and it has been almost totally ignored by history. I wish I could do it justice - you just have to read it.

The Economics of Open Access Law Publishing (pdf) by Jessica Litman
I am only just starting to understand this but it is becoming a lot clearer. The paper is loose support for what I wrote about a few weeks ago. We've always believed that monetary incentives were the most powerful motivators of people but the internet realigns some of those priorities. A lot of people are using the word 'love' but I think passion might be a better term. I think if you can start to think that way, it puts you miles and miles ahead of the prevailing backwards mindset.

Nobody who participates in any way in the law journal article research, writing, selection, editing and publication process does so because of copyright incentives. Indeed, copyright is sufficiently irrelevant that legal scholars, the institutions that employ them and the journals that publish their research tolerate considerable uncertainty about who owns the copyright to the works in question, without engaging in serious efforts to resolve it. They do this because they view the production of legal scholarship as within their core mission, as important to the legal academy as their function of educating lawyers. Once that scholarship is generated, moreover, its investors get the most bang for their buck if it is disseminated, read, and cited as widely as possible

This article from Tyler Cowen talks more about the economics of it. This thread is also getting good.

March 11, 2008

Random Rules for Myself

[*] Never take an elevator to the second floor
[*] If someone wants to go faster, let them pass
[*] Always pull the car up to the very end of the curb (never waste a parking spot)
[*] Don't ask someone to do something you can easily do yourself
[*] Never correct someone's pronunciation of a word with the more appropriate ethnic accentuation
[*] Be in the middle of a book at all times
[*] Unless it's an atrocity, take responsibility for it. You're probably more at fault than you know


March 10, 2008

The Narrative Fallacy

When I first moved to LA, I didn't have enough money to buy a bed. I borrowed an IKEA futon and slept on the floor for almost two months. I was so stressed and scared that I would wake up in the middle of the night just soaked in sweat. My parents practically disowned me.

Here's the thing, I could make that all into some dramatic story - like it was this harrowing experience that stays with me - but to be frank, I have almost no recollection of that time. Not because I blocked it out or anything, but because it didn't seem worth remembering. I worked through it and now I've got things back where I like them.

The more painful the initiation, the more likely we are to want to stick with the program. The more inspiring and metaphoric we make our stories, the less they seem to resemble the dull and comfortably literal world that the rest of us live in. We start to think that we're different, that the laws don't apply to us - that all we have to do is let manifest destiny take its course. This denies the fundamental role of hard work and sacrifice and luck in everything. Narration conveniently ignores the day we laid around and watched tv and the week where we were sure we were going to quit but didn't. It's just not honest.

I guess I could slowly trick myself into thinking that my first few real months in LA will end up molding who I am. "Oh to be be young and driven..." But then I'm more attached to the path I've embarked on, those become hard, sunk costs. I'll start to think that that was the "right way" as opposed to a way and my judgment will be clouded and off.

The fact of the matter is this: I'm 20. I have a cool job that was not without its tradeoffs. I wake up and sometimes I'm super motivated, sometimes I'm not. I've been doing it for a while. I've had days where I thought to myself that it was over and others where I leaped way ahead. That sounds a lot different than the 200 word biography I could type up for myself if I wanted to impress someone.

There is this Stoic exercise where you break apart something sacred into its most basic parts. When you see how unromantic it really is, the object loses all power over you - you maintain the sovereignty of self. Marcus does this throughout Meditations: sex is rubbing and semen, the cloak of the Emperor differs only in color, death is but the end of feeling.

Shit like prodigy or lucky or "destined for big things" and whatever other superlatives I hear are stories. Just stories. And stories are worthless because they're mental creations - they are not reality. In ten years, you tell me what bank is going to cash a protégé label. Yours are different but the same.

No question, the use of story is a persuasive tactic. But why? Because they please and pleasure the senses. When stories are applied to self-perception, they are called delusions.

I don't think the idea is to strip the meaning and specialness out of life. There is still very much a purpose and uniqueness in us. That is innate. But humbleness, clarity, and restraint - those are learned and practiced forms of excellence. They are the extension of honesty. This doesn't mean you're unappreciative or pessimistic. Or good food turns to ash in your mouth. That you have to hate the things you want to like. It doesn't change so much how you live life, as much as it does how you talk about it.

Still, that is not easy either. We are wired to think a certain way - linearly, towards purpose, in terms of justification. Ambivalence, in the jungle, was death. The mind strives for congruency and lashes out violently when there isn't any. It's also why people wake up one day and have no idea how the world works anymore. That's why people say things like "Do you have any idea who I am?" with a straight face.

Resisting the urge to tell yourself stories is difficult. It's depressing. You fuck up and do it all the time. And occasionally, with little things, that's OK. Mixed with my self-loathing, I'm often overwhelmed. And tired. And feel like quitting. I have trouble really putting to words how much I struggle with whether its worth it - but if I didn't say that, I wouldn't be being honest. It works for me because I work at it but just barely.

I don't think it's a fight you can win on your own - it takes people on both sides, cynical and optimistic to keep you centered. Living in delusion is a short-term strategy - simply unsustainable. My philosophy, and it's one that's working pretty well is this: There are more than enough people willing to tell your story for you if its good enough. In the meantime, I've too much other stuff I need to work on.
.

March 07, 2008

The Search

"And as long as you keep digging, it will keep bubbling up." Marcus Aurelius, Mediations

Things get shitty when I stop and almost always get better when I start again. But I stop all the time. Why? Because I start to think that I know more than I actually do - that I've am an exception to a rule. I read a bunch of good books about addiction recently (Beautiful Boy, Tweak, When Pain Killers Become Dangerous) and an addict's mind works the same way. To justify using, the body will create pain. I like to think about how the 'easy way' always seems to feel like the 'right way.' I'm not sure how you fight that, other than constantly being aware - understanding that your brain can't just be defaulted to. And surrounding yourself with people who call you out on your bullshit.

March 06, 2008

What Does the World Want to Know.

"The world wants to know if you have cojones. If you are brave. Then it can decide your price, he said
Some people dont have a price.
That is true.
What about those people?
Those people die.
I aint afraid to die.
That is good. It will help you die. It will not help you live."

All the Pretty Horses, Cormac McCarthy

March 04, 2008

You can do whatever you want. Seriously.

I've said it before. I doubt it sometimes (like everyone) it but I'm in a constant battle to prove to myself that it's true.

Last week, Robert handed me three books and asked if I'd read them for as research for 50 and pick out all the important parts. That coincided nicely with the fact that I'd already read, tabbed and written about them on my own. Now I was going to get a check for it.

Fridays, now, are study days. I redid my schedule, basing it around something I've wanted for a long time: A day spent totally on learning. I drive back to college and spend most of the day in the library. I go to a few classes, but mainly it's just a day for learning. I take books, my laptop and an iPod and spend the entire day working. I read Academic Journals and archived articles from Lexis Nexis. It's what I wanted and what I worked for. I not only found a person who was understand enough to see that I needed it but great enough to see that it'd help with everything else I did.

I get paid for all kinds of stuff that I didn't even know it was possible to make money doing. Stuff I used to do with my friends in college, sites I'd read anyway for fun, what I do to relax, things I can't even talk about publicly - it's all interwoven into the niche I'm setting up for myself. And slowly, it's being filtered through a schedule that keeps me sane and excited. It was hard, sure, but it wasn't impossible. I just listened to people who cut their own path before me.

I've always known that I was a bit different - that I had something that most people don't have. But instead of feeling confident, like that was an asset, I doubted myself. I knew that I wouldn't be doing what everyone else was doing but I didn't know that I'd be doing something better - I thought I'd be rejected instead of doing the rejecting. (Or something close to that. Needless to say, it wasn't a positive state of mind) That's how it works, the system is aimed at breaking people who can disrupt it. The superficial incentives all point to mediocrity and sameness. But when you leave that state of mind, everything changes.

It's scary sure. It's not somewhere devoid of work or effort or inconvenience. Still, it is a space where your priorities are the things that matter to you - not other people - and you don't waste time on things that mean nothing. Since that makes you massively, massively more efficient, you start lapping people. And then you learn about a wonderful thing called cumulative advantage.

Here's my thinking: You can do whatever you want for as long as you continue to believe that it's true and it will be. When you start resigning yourself to "this is what I have to do" or "this is what I have to be" that's when you're done. So don't. It's pretty simple. Find out what matters to you, decide what you want and ask for it.

(And if you want evidence of how shitty it feels to be broken and bitter and full of cognitive dissonance, just wait and read the comments)

Subscribe to this blog's feed