<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Attacking Strategy Pt. 2</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ryanholiday.net/attacking-strategy-pt-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/attacking-strategy-pt-2/</link>
	<description>Meditations on strategy and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:06:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Holiday</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/attacking-strategy-pt-2/#comment-9325</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:34:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.ryanholiday.net/attacking-strategy-pt-2/#comment-9325</guid>
		<description>Those are good questions, and I&#039;ll attempt to address them in another post.

When you attack tactics, you have very few options: Be faster, more efficient, do a better job at whatever the &quot;thing&quot; is. When you attack strategy, you have a limitless array of options to choose from as your path.

Kerry (because he is an idiot) ran his campaign as &quot;I am not a flip-flopper&quot; because he was attacking the tactical maneuvers of the Bush camp. If he&#039;d fought strategically, he could have been literally anything else &quot;I&#039;m an idealist,&quot; &quot;I&#039;m an outsider&quot; &quot;I&#039;m an idealist who instead of talking gets things done,&quot; &quot;I like to molest children,&quot; anything. When you rebel against something, you&#039;re still letting it define you.

The Epictetus isn&#039;t a counter at all, and it has very little to do with the discussion.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Those are good questions, and I&#8217;ll attempt to address them in another post.</p>
<p>When you attack tactics, you have very few options: Be faster, more efficient, do a better job at whatever the &#8220;thing&#8221; is. When you attack strategy, you have a limitless array of options to choose from as your path.</p>
<p>Kerry (because he is an idiot) ran his campaign as &#8220;I am not a flip-flopper&#8221; because he was attacking the tactical maneuvers of the Bush camp. If he&#8217;d fought strategically, he could have been literally anything else &#8220;I&#8217;m an idealist,&#8221; &#8220;I&#8217;m an outsider&#8221; &#8220;I&#8217;m an idealist who instead of talking gets things done,&#8221; &#8220;I like to molest children,&#8221; anything. When you rebel against something, you&#8217;re still letting it define you.</p>
<p>The Epictetus isn&#8217;t a counter at all, and it has very little to do with the discussion.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ilan Bouchard</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/attacking-strategy-pt-2/#comment-9324</link>
		<dc:creator>Ilan Bouchard</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:08:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.ryanholiday.net/attacking-strategy-pt-2/#comment-9324</guid>
		<description>&quot;The best possible position to be in is you. When you&#039;re you, you don&#039;t have to do any work.&quot;

I&#039;ll counter that with a quote from Epictetus: &quot;First, be who you would be.  Then, do what you would do.&quot;

It&#039;s easy to say that &quot;being you&quot; is the best choice if you&#039;re smart, eloquent, and ambitious.  I may be missing the point of your post, but it sounds almost like the cliché that you should love yourself because you&#039;re great the way you are.  (Though you&#039;re applying it to marketing.)  What do you propose to the guy who lacks the talent and creativity to create anything better than knock-offs of popular Youtube videos?

Truth be told, the last paragraph of your post here confused the hell out of me.  I don&#039;t see the correlation between &quot;refusing to be defined by other people&quot; and attacking strategy (except, perhaps, that the former is a good defense against the latter).

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;The best possible position to be in is you. When you&#8217;re you, you don&#8217;t have to do any work.&#8221;</p>
<p>I&#8217;ll counter that with a quote from Epictetus: &#8220;First, be who you would be.  Then, do what you would do.&#8221;</p>
<p>It&#8217;s easy to say that &#8220;being you&#8221; is the best choice if you&#8217;re smart, eloquent, and ambitious.  I may be missing the point of your post, but it sounds almost like the cliché that you should love yourself because you&#8217;re great the way you are.  (Though you&#8217;re applying it to marketing.)  What do you propose to the guy who lacks the talent and creativity to create anything better than knock-offs of popular Youtube videos?</p>
<p>Truth be told, the last paragraph of your post here confused the hell out of me.  I don&#8217;t see the correlation between &#8220;refusing to be defined by other people&#8221; and attacking strategy (except, perhaps, that the former is a good defense against the latter).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Blank</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/attacking-strategy-pt-2/#comment-9323</link>
		<dc:creator>Blank</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 22:07:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.ryanholiday.net/attacking-strategy-pt-2/#comment-9323</guid>
		<description>Well, you also have to look at how the Bush administration handled its job during elections in states like Ohio. The democrats focussed only on Cleveland, and the cities, but Bush&#039;s campaign took on the broad provincial districts and totally undercut the democratic effort. I recommend taking a look at a documentary called &quot;...So goes the nation.&quot; They&#039;ve been playing it often on IFC recently, and it provides an interesting look into the 04 election.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you also have to look at how the Bush administration handled its job during elections in states like Ohio. The democrats focussed only on Cleveland, and the cities, but Bush&#8217;s campaign took on the broad provincial districts and totally undercut the democratic effort. I recommend taking a look at a documentary called &#8220;&#8230;So goes the nation.&#8221; They&#8217;ve been playing it often on IFC recently, and it provides an interesting look into the 04 election.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: amphibian</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/attacking-strategy-pt-2/#comment-9322</link>
		<dc:creator>amphibian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 30 Dec 2007 21:26:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.ryanholiday.net/attacking-strategy-pt-2/#comment-9322</guid>
		<description>About two weeks ago, I was talking to my younger brother about presidential politics. I made it clear that I was not an expert, but we got into it. I said to him that Kerry letting himself be swiftboated and flip-flopped into losing the swing voters was the dumbest thing I&#039;ve seen in presidential elections.

The whole thing highlighted just how terrible Kerry was at communicating what he wanted to get across to the voters he needed. I think that inability to speak effectively comes from the fifty consultants saying &quot;Be this guy on Monday, this on Tuesday and that on Wednesday and the voters will like you.&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>About two weeks ago, I was talking to my younger brother about presidential politics. I made it clear that I was not an expert, but we got into it. I said to him that Kerry letting himself be swiftboated and flip-flopped into losing the swing voters was the dumbest thing I&#8217;ve seen in presidential elections.</p>
<p>The whole thing highlighted just how terrible Kerry was at communicating what he wanted to get across to the voters he needed. I think that inability to speak effectively comes from the fifty consultants saying &#8220;Be this guy on Monday, this on Tuesday and that on Wednesday and the voters will like you.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

