<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Email on the Paper</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ryanholiday.net/email-on-the-paper/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/email-on-the-paper/</link>
	<description>Meditations on strategy and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:06:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryan Holiday</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/email-on-the-paper/#comment-9168</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryan Holiday</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 14:59:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.ryanholiday.net/email-on-the-paper/#comment-9168</guid>
		<description>For some reason, I don&#039;t. I know Robert talks about it a lot and actually, Made to Stick has a really good introduction about it.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For some reason, I don&#8217;t. I know Robert talks about it a lot and actually, Made to Stick has a really good introduction about it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Cole</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/email-on-the-paper/#comment-9167</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Cole</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Dec 2007 12:29:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.ryanholiday.net/email-on-the-paper/#comment-9167</guid>
		<description>When writing a paper, I usually have a similar process; that is, I have an idea, ponder on it during spare time for a couple days and by the time I put pen to paper, I already know 3/4 of the content. However, I had never thought of additional ideas being applied to the thesis as being a &#039;sub-thesis&#039;. Calling them &#039;supporting attributes&#039; or &#039;additional arguments&#039; never seemed to be entirely correct to me.

Do you know of any excellent readings on The Commander&#039;s Intent? Google&#039;s actually managed to disappoint me on this one.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When writing a paper, I usually have a similar process; that is, I have an idea, ponder on it during spare time for a couple days and by the time I put pen to paper, I already know 3/4 of the content. However, I had never thought of additional ideas being applied to the thesis as being a &#8216;sub-thesis&#8217;. Calling them &#8216;supporting attributes&#8217; or &#8216;additional arguments&#8217; never seemed to be entirely correct to me.</p>
<p>Do you know of any excellent readings on The Commander&#8217;s Intent? Google&#8217;s actually managed to disappoint me on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

