<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ethics and Praise on Book Jackets</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ryanholiday.net/ethics-and-praise-on-book-jackets/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/ethics-and-praise-on-book-jackets/</link>
	<description>Meditations on strategy and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 22:06:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sean</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/ethics-and-praise-on-book-jackets/#comment-9406</link>
		<dc:creator>Sean</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 19:00:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.ryanholiday.net/ethics-and-praise-on-book-jackets/#comment-9406</guid>
		<description>Yeah, I see your point. But I don&#039;t think the line is as clear cut. For instance, if [book that validates Google&#039;s business model] has a blurb from Eric Schmidt stating, &quot;If you want to understand our business model, read this book!&quot; I&#039;d say that&#039;d be a pretty honest and straightforward endorsement, and transform what would otherwise be a conflict of interest into something helpful to the consumer (like if the consumer was trying to find books related to Google&#039;s business model -- that&#039;d be a beneficial blurb, assuming Schmidt&#039;s honesty.)

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yeah, I see your point. But I don&#8217;t think the line is as clear cut. For instance, if [book that validates Google's business model] has a blurb from Eric Schmidt stating, &#8220;If you want to understand our business model, read this book!&#8221; I&#8217;d say that&#8217;d be a pretty honest and straightforward endorsement, and transform what would otherwise be a conflict of interest into something helpful to the consumer (like if the consumer was trying to find books related to Google&#8217;s business model &#8212; that&#8217;d be a beneficial blurb, assuming Schmidt&#8217;s honesty.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris Johnson</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/ethics-and-praise-on-book-jackets/#comment-9405</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Johnson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 15:58:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.ryanholiday.net/ethics-and-praise-on-book-jackets/#comment-9405</guid>
		<description>There is an ethical issue, sure.

But look: just because you benefit from a book doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s not a great book. The rest is marketing.  You might be a subject of a book and learn something AND Be a fan.

Plus, people are able to cut the bullshit so it&#039;s saying &quot;I want to be counted in Eric Schmidt&#039;s Camp,&quot; or &quot;If you like seth godin, you&#039;ll dig this book....&quot;

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is an ethical issue, sure.</p>
<p>But look: just because you benefit from a book doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s not a great book. The rest is marketing.  You might be a subject of a book and learn something AND Be a fan.</p>
<p>Plus, people are able to cut the bullshit so it&#8217;s saying &#8220;I want to be counted in Eric Schmidt&#8217;s Camp,&#8221; or &#8220;If you like seth godin, you&#8217;ll dig this book&#8230;.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/ethics-and-praise-on-book-jackets/#comment-9404</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 14:27:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.ryanholiday.net/ethics-and-praise-on-book-jackets/#comment-9404</guid>
		<description>Amen to that.

And there should be proof that the blurber has actually read the book and isn&#039;t simply being forced by the publishing company to fulfill some contractual requirement to sign N number of blurbs per year.

I just read a so-called horror novel that Steven King praised as &quot;Best of the Century.&quot; That should have been my first red flag, since 94% of the century remained in the future at the time the blurb was written.

The book sucked, and so did Steven King&#039;s blurb.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Amen to that.</p>
<p>And there should be proof that the blurber has actually read the book and isn&#8217;t simply being forced by the publishing company to fulfill some contractual requirement to sign N number of blurbs per year.</p>
<p>I just read a so-called horror novel that Steven King praised as &#8220;Best of the Century.&#8221; That should have been my first red flag, since 94% of the century remained in the future at the time the blurb was written.</p>
<p>The book sucked, and so did Steven King&#8217;s blurb.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

