<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Origin of Ideas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.ryanholiday.net/origin-of-ideas/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/origin-of-ideas/</link>
	<description>Meditations on strategy and life</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Feb 2012 20:25:46 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: matt</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/origin-of-ideas/#comment-9930</link>
		<dc:creator>matt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 18:08:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.ryanholiday.net/origin-of-ideas/#comment-9930</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what has always irked me about how incredibly anal teachers and professors are about citations and plagiarism. I mean yes, it is extremely important to give credit where credit is due, especially in a field where ideas are currency and reputation, but for academic professionals to be so insecure about their work that you can potentially fail a class with an XF (failure due to cheating) because you failed to correctly cite or, god forbid, &quot;stole&quot; someone else&#039;s take on a situation is ludicrous.

Shouldn&#039;t academics be flattered someone trusted their work enough to use it instead of immediately going on the defensive? Maybe I&#039;m overgeneralizing a bit but it still seems insane.

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what has always irked me about how incredibly anal teachers and professors are about citations and plagiarism. I mean yes, it is extremely important to give credit where credit is due, especially in a field where ideas are currency and reputation, but for academic professionals to be so insecure about their work that you can potentially fail a class with an XF (failure due to cheating) because you failed to correctly cite or, god forbid, &#8220;stole&#8221; someone else&#8217;s take on a situation is ludicrous.</p>
<p>Shouldn&#8217;t academics be flattered someone trusted their work enough to use it instead of immediately going on the defensive? Maybe I&#8217;m overgeneralizing a bit but it still seems insane.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://www.ryanholiday.net/origin-of-ideas/#comment-9929</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2008 01:58:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://dev.ryanholiday.net/origin-of-ideas/#comment-9929</guid>
		<description>Well said. I immediately thought of this quote, and thought you might find it relevant:

&quot;References to the OODA Loop were popping up everywhere from newspaper stories to the advice of business consultants.  As had been the case with E-M, many of the references did not mention Boyd.  His work had become generic. And as had been the case with E-M, he laughed and said he did not mind. The most important thing was that the ideas became known.&quot; - Robert Coram, Boyd, Page 384

</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said. I immediately thought of this quote, and thought you might find it relevant:</p>
<p>&#8220;References to the OODA Loop were popping up everywhere from newspaper stories to the advice of business consultants.  As had been the case with E-M, many of the references did not mention Boyd.  His work had become generic. And as had been the case with E-M, he laughed and said he did not mind. The most important thing was that the ideas became known.&#8221; &#8211; Robert Coram, Boyd, Page 384</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

